Ecuador: So was that a coup attempt?

There are plenty of things to talk about regarding yesterday's events in Ecuador. But for fun, I'll start with the semantics. I saw people arguing all day over the use of the word "coup" or "golpe."

Reasons why it was a coup attempt:
  • The biggest reason to consider it a coup attempt is that people were uncertain whether Ecuador's government would survive the crisis. Uncertainty about the government stability made it feel like a coup attempt was taking place.
  • The president was held in a hospital against his will by members of the security forces.
  • Former President Lucio Gutierrez appeared to use the situation to call for new elections.
Reasons it was not a coup attempt:
  • The biggest reason to not consider it a coup attempt is that police protesters did not appear to have the goal of changing the government. They seemed to be protesting to change a law and the situation spiraled out of control. Even at its peak, the police never demanded that President Correa and his government step down or offered a different leader in his place which is a rather vital step in a coup attempt.
  • The military fully backed the president and the democratic government. While President Correa's life was in danger, the executive branch as an institution appeared fairly solid throughout the crisis.
  • A presidential kidnapping or assassination attempt is not necessarily a coup attempt. The authors have to have the intent of changing the government, not just an individual leader or law.
So what will you call it?
  • Feel free to use or not use "coup attempt." You're not wrong if you use it or don't use it. I find myself using that term at times in speaking with people because of the uncertainty of the day. However, I don't think it's completely accurate as the police do not appear to have tried to change who runs the government institutions.
  • The word "protest," though that's how it started, doesn't seem to capture the gravity of the situation, and I would recommend something stronger to describe the day's full events.
  • Someone yesterday used the term "mutiny," which I thought was an interesting choice in place of coup. Perhaps "insurrection." I've seen the words "insubordination" and "rebellion" in Ecuador's media. More words for consideration.
  • "Crisis", "unrest", and "instability" are always good generic terms. I tend to use those when I don't want to fight the semantic argument.
President Correa and his supporters appeared yesterday to want to use the words "coup attempt." History is written by the winners. For that reason, beyond any other definition discussions everyone else has, yesterday's events will likely be known as a "coup attempt."

Finally, it matters what happens after this. If Correa goes on to have a successful term and hand off power democratically to another leader some day, 30 September 2010 will likely be known as the day of the coup attempt against Correa. However, if this is just one in a string of events that threatens or eventually brings down Correa's government, then yesterday will look differently in the history books, perhaps as the start of an insurrection or popular protest movement. Future events over the coming months and years will shape how yesterday is described, so there can't be a complete and full answer one day later.

6 comments:

boz said...

Protests, crisis, unrest, mutiny, insurrection, instability, coup. Any other words we could use?

boz said...

"Chaos"? Ok word. Not particularly descriptive from a political sense.

Daniel said...

How about "uprising" ("alzamiento")?

Tambopaxi said...

Ecuadorians use the word levantamiento (same as uprising). Almost no one here sees the events of Thursday as an attempted golpe de estado (although Correa y cia are gonna call it that until the cows come home).

I'm not going to put it down here (not enough space), but I wrote down some questions on an Ecuadorian blog site, www.forodemocratico.org on things I'm wondering about regarding Thursday's events.

The more I think about it, the fishier it looks. Whatever the case, though, there's no doubt that Correa will use Thursday to strengthen and consolidate his hold on political power and institutions in Ecuador as Chavez did after the attempted coup of 2002 in his country. Thursday (well and some other factors relating to the crumby performance of the Asamblea Nacional) presents a golden opportunity for Correa to acquire more, if not, complete, power, and he's not going to pass on that...

Fabio said...

I vote for "rebellion."

It disturbs me that, once again in this part of the world, the fate of the country is decided by where the military places its allegiance. My own feelings aside about Correa and what he did to bring this upon himself, the police--or at least its leadership-- must be held accountable.

Interesting theater, as always...

boz said...

It disturbs me that, once again in this part of the world, the fate of the country is decided by where the military places its allegiance.

That is an excellent and important point, one I hope to write about if I find time in the next week.

On one hand, the fact that the military never wavered in its support for Correa was an excellent sign of democracy. At the same time, the fact that we all watch the military in cases like this with a bit of uncertainty....

Tambopaxi, I disagree with those who claim that Thursday was pure political theater staged for the benefit of Correa. There was definitely a very real protest and gun fight that occurred. At the same time, it does appear Correa milked the situation for PR purposes and knew that it would benefit his image if he made it through.